CommissionIssues

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

U.S. Export Controls Involving India: A Reality Check

Posted on 7:21 PM by Unknown
Following the President's trip to India last month there has been a great deal of misinformation in the Indian press regarding the "lifting" and "relaxation" of dual-use export controls on India, including the removal of Indian entities from the Bureau of Industry and Security's Entity List (15 CFR Part 744, Supplement 4). (See previous post on importance of complying with Entity List.)

Although U.S. dual-use export controls affect less than one percent of U.S. trade with India trade, there has been a good deal of misunderstanding on the scope of U.S. export controls involving exports of goods, software and technology to India. An excellent report by the American Enterprise Institute noted that in in 1999 24 percent of total U.S. exports to India required a “dual-use” license from BIS.  That number is less than 0.2 percent today.

Here is a summary of the pending changes to U.S. export controls on India:

First, only the following India companies and organizations will be removed from the Entity List:
  • Bharat Dynamics Limited
  • Four remaining subordinates of the Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO): 
    • Armament Research and Development Establishment (ARDE)
    • Defense Research and Development Lab (DRDL) 
    • Missile Research and Development Complex
    • Solid State Physics Laboratory
  • Four remaining subordinates of the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO): 
    • Liquid Propulsion Systems Center,
    • Solid Propellant Space Booster Plant (SPROB)
    • Sriharikota Space Center (SHAR), and 
    • Vikram Sarabhai Space Center (VSSC).
The entities associated with India's Department of Atomic Energy, including India's nuclear reactors, will remain on the Entity List for the foreseeable future. As a result, an export license is required to export all items "subject to the EAR" to Department of Atomic Energy facilities. BIS has a case-by-case licensing approval policy for controlled items and a presumption of approval for EAR99 items.


Note that the entities listed above will remain on the Entity List until BIS issues a final rule in the Federal Register amending the Entity List, which is expected in the coming weeks.

Second, BIS will “realign” India in the Export Administration Regulations to reflect its status as a strategic partner and therefore treating India similarly to other close allies and partners. This realignment will remove India from categories within the EAR that connote it as a “country of concern”—with a focus on Country Groups A and D. In exchange, India has agreed to undertake to harmonize its national control list with the multilateral regimes and impose reexport controls on certain U.S.-origin items.

Third, the U.S. has agreed to support India’s membership in the four multilateral export control regimes—the Nuclear Suppliers Group, Missile Technology Control Regime, Australia Group, and Wassenaar Arrangement. India will undertake to adopt the multilateral regimes’ export control requirements to reflect its prospective membership. The U.S. has indicated that India should qualify for membership in the Australia Group and the Wassenaar Arrangement once India imposes export controls over all items on these regimes’ control lists.


Exports to India will not be eligible for the proposed Strategic Trade Authorization (STA) License Exception that was recently published by BIS in the Federal Register.

In general, exports to India of items classified as EAR99 (the designation for items not on the Commerce Control List) can take place without having to obtain an export license from BIS. As with all exports, no unlicensed exports can be made to prohibited parties or for prohibited end-uses. An export license is required to export most items to India included on the Commerce Control List.

No change has been made to U.S. exports of defense articles to India subject to the ITAR. An export license from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls is required to export all items to India that are subject to the jurisdiction of the ITAR and the Arms Export Control Act.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in BIS, Export Controls, India | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • OFAC Announces Rare "Finding of Violation" for Failing to File Blocked Property Reports
    OFAC's Office of Enforcement last week issued a rare " Finding of Violation " to Visa International Service Association for fa...
  • DDTC Issues Announcement Regarding Use of USML Category XXI
    The State Department's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) issued an announcement (doc) today that could impact many exporter...
  • BIS Publishes Final Rule Regarding In-Country Transfers to Parties on Entity List
    The Bureau of Industry (BIS) published a final rule (PDF) in today's Federal Register amending several sections of Part 744 of the Exp...
  • Photos From BIS 2010 Export Control Forum
    Below are some photos from the Bureau of Industry and Security's 2010 Export Control Forum that was held earlier this week in Irvine, Ca...
  • Highlights from Bureau of Industry and Security's 2012 Annual Report
    The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) recently published its annual report to Congress for Fiscal Year 2012. In addition to providing a...
  • BIS Imposes Denial Orders and Civil Penalties in Cases Involving Unlicensed Exports From U.S. to Taiwan
    In a series of four related cases involving the unlicensed exports of chemicals, metals and electronic components from the U.S. to Taiwan, t...
  • AEI to Present Export Control Reform Program on October 5th in Washington, DC
    While there have been a large number of export control events scheduled lately, here is another good one to add to your calendar. The Americ...
  • BIS Publishes Rule Making Editorial Changes to Commerce Control List
    The Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a final rule in today's Federal Register modifying the Co...
  • Addressing Today’s Most Common Corporate Compliance Gaps
    Guest Post Addressing Today’s Most Common Corporate Compliance Gaps By Steve Kuzma and Paul Harris, Ernst & Young LLP* Increased corpora...
  • Seasons Greetings and Happy New Year From International Trade Law News and Letter to Santa Regarding Possible Compliance Violations
    Season's Greetings and Happy New Year to all of our loyal readers and clients around the world. See you in 201 3 .  In the spirit of th...

Categories

  • 10+2 (1)
  • 2B350 (1)
  • AES (12)
  • Antidumping (17)
  • ATPA (1)
  • Belarus (2)
  • best practices (1)
  • BIS (56)
  • BIS Update Conference (14)
  • BIS; EAR (22)
  • BIS; EAR; (7)
  • Boycotts (2)
  • Burma/Myanmar (1)
  • C-TPAT (3)
  • Canada (2)
  • CBP (20)
  • CBP; Marking (1)
  • CEEC (1)
  • Census (11)
  • CFIUS (2)
  • China (8)
  • China; (11)
  • Commerce Department (2)
  • Congress (10)
  • Countervailing Duties (8)
  • CPSC (1)
  • Cuba (18)
  • Customs (12)
  • Customs Brokers (1)
  • DDTC (21)
  • EAA (1)
  • Export Controls (144)
  • Exports (17)
  • FAST (1)
  • FCPA (34)
  • Free Trade Agreements (4)
  • GSP (8)
  • HTS (2)
  • Incoterms (8)
  • India (6)
  • ITAR (46)
  • ITC (2)
  • Japan (2)
  • Libya (5)
  • Miscellaneous (27)
  • NASA (3)
  • North Korea (8)
  • OFAC (36)
  • Sanctions (10)
  • Sanctions; Iran (58)
  • Sanctions; Sanctions; Syria (1)
  • Sanctions; Sudan (6)
  • Sanctions; Syria (6)
  • State Department (4)
  • Trade Policy (1)
  • TSRA (1)
  • Twitter (1)
  • UAE (5)
  • United Kingdom (1)
  • United Nations (3)
  • USTR (3)
  • Vietnam (2)
  • WTO (2)
  • Zimbabwe (1)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (17)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (32)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2011 (63)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ▼  2010 (114)
    • ▼  December (12)
      • Congress Adjourns Without Renewing GSP or Passing ...
      • News and Update on Export Controls Certification R...
      • OFAC Imposes Civil Penalties on Two Financial Inst...
      • U.S. Export Controls Involving India: A Reality Check
      • U.S. Company and Its Chinese Subsidiary Pay $3.75 ...
      • Happy Holidays and Happy New Year From Internation...
      • U.S. Customs Seizes Thousands of Cuban Cigars
      • Today is International Anti-Corruption Day
      • CNBC Running Series Called "Forbidden Zone: Invest...
      • OFAC Issues Statement on Location of SDN List
      • U.S. Export Controls/Sanctions Programs to be Held...
      • Redesign of Treasury's Website Changes Links to SD...
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2009 (237)
    • ►  December (35)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (29)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (29)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ►  2008 (37)
    • ►  December (37)
Powered by Blogger.