CommissionIssues

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

News and Update on Export Controls Certification Requirement in New U.S. Immigration Form I-129

Posted on 2:10 PM by Unknown
The following guest post, by Brian Graham, an experienced immigration attorney with the law firm of Strasburger & Price LLP in Austin, Texas, discusses the new export control certification requirements contained in the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services' (USCIS) new I-129 form that must be used starting tomorrow.

Note that because of concerns and other inquiries raised by immigration attorneys and the business community about this new export certification requirement, USCIS announced today that petitioners will not be required to complete the export control certification contained in the form until February 20, 2011.

IMMIGRATION FORM I-129 UPDATED TO REFERENCE EXPORT CONTROLS
Effective December 23, 2010, a new I-129 Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker form will be required by all employers filing visa petitions with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for foreign workers in the H-1B, H-1B1, L-1 and O-1A categories. These visa categories cover professionals and workers in specialty occupations, intra-company transfers of company executives and people with "extraordinary ability".
Among the key revisions to the I-129 form is a new Part 6 requiring a certification regarding the release of controlled technology or technical data to foreign person in the U.S., which is commonly referred to as the "deemed export" rule. Under the Department of Commerce's Export Administration Regulations (EAR), an export of technology or source code (except encryption source code) is "deemed" to take place when it is released to a foreign national within the United States. A similar concept is contained in the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) with respect to ITAR-controlled technical data.
Part 6 of the new I-129 form requires the petitioning employer to attest that it has reviewed the EAR and ITAR and has determined that either: (1) A license is not required from either U.S. Department of Commerce or the U.S. Department of State to release such technology or technical data to the foreign person; or, (2) a license is required from either the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) or the U.S. Department of State's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) to release such technology or technical data to the beneficiary and the petitioner will prevent access to the controlled technology or technical data by the beneficiary until and unless the petitioner has received the required license or other authorization to release it to the beneficiary.
Although the EAR and ITAR's export licensing requirements for controlled technical data are certainly not new, the inclusion of this certification requirement in the new I-129 form marks the first time USCIS has made these questions a part of the mainstream immigration process. It is widely believed that the employer's responses to Part 6 of the new I-129 form will be used for data collection and enforcement purposes. The new questions are not expected to change the process of obtaining an employment visa at U.S. consulates abroad, since the consular posts retain independent jurisdiction to investigate whether issuing a visa might trigger a deemed export violation.

Since the export certification is signed by the employer under penalty of perjury, it is imperative that employers filing I-129 petitions for H-1B, H-1B1, L-1, or O-1A workers undertake the review with the assistance of attorneys, consultants or in-house staff who have experience with the EAR and ITAR in order to determine whether an export license is required and, if so, to take the necessary precautions to avoid violating either the ITAR or the EAR prior to receipt of the license.
Editors Note: The "deemed export" rule appears in section 734.2(b)(2)(ii) of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and provides that:
"any release of technology or source code subject to the EAR to a foreign national . . . is deemed to be an export to the home country or countries of the foreign national. This deemed export rule does not apply to persons lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and does not apply to persons who are protected individuals under the Immigration and Naturalization Act (8 U.S.C. 1324b(a)(3)). Note that the release of any item to any party with knowledge a violation is about to occur is prohibited by 736.2(b)(10) of the EAR."
A similar concept is contained in section 120.17(4) of the ITAR, which states that an export includes "disclosing (including oral or visual disclosure) or transferring technical data to a foreign person, whether in the United States or abroad." As a result, an export license or other authorization is required to be obtained from DDTC in order to permit the disclosure of ITAR controlled technical data to foreign persons in the U.S.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Export Controls, ITAR | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Deadline for NCITD International Trade Scholarship is Approaching
    Update: Application deadline extended to April 15, 2010. The National Council on International Trade Development (NCITD) has established a ...
  • OFAC Announces Rare "Finding of Violation" for Failing to File Blocked Property Reports
    OFAC's Office of Enforcement last week issued a rare " Finding of Violation " to Visa International Service Association for fa...
  • Chinese National Pleads Guilty for Involvement in Scheme to Export "Massive Quantities" of Controlled Carbon Fiber to China
    On August 19, 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice announced that Mr. Ming Suan Zhang, a citizen of the People's Republic of China, ple...
  • BIS Imposes Denial Orders and Civil Penalties in Cases Involving Unlicensed Exports From U.S. to Taiwan
    In a series of four related cases involving the unlicensed exports of chemicals, metals and electronic components from the U.S. to Taiwan, t...
  • OFAC Makes "Large Scale" Changes to SDN List
    The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control today announced that it released an updated version of its list of Specially ...
  • BIS to Hold Webinar on Impact of Export Control Reform on EAR License Exceptions on August 14, 2013
    Instead of the weekly teleconference, on August 14, 2013 at 2:30 pm EDT, the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)...
  • Fundamentals of Exporting Webinar to be Presented by U.S. Export Assistance Center of Missouri
    The U.S. Export Assistance Center of Missouri is presenting a series of six webinars on the fundamentals of exporting in January through Mar...
  • Highlights from Bureau of Industry and Security's 2012 Annual Report
    The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) recently published its annual report to Congress for Fiscal Year 2012. In addition to providing a...
  • Freight Forwarder Fined For Export Violation May be Forced to Shut Down
    American Metal Market ( www.amm.com) recently ran the following story containing additional details on our recent post describing the rec...
  • Reminder: February 20th is Effective Date of Export Control Licensing Certification on USCIS Visa Form I-129
    This is a reminder that February 20, 2011 is the effective date for completion of the new "Certification Pertaining to the Release of C...

Categories

  • 10+2 (1)
  • 2B350 (1)
  • AES (12)
  • Antidumping (17)
  • ATPA (1)
  • Belarus (2)
  • best practices (1)
  • BIS (56)
  • BIS Update Conference (14)
  • BIS; EAR (22)
  • BIS; EAR; (7)
  • Boycotts (2)
  • Burma/Myanmar (1)
  • C-TPAT (3)
  • Canada (2)
  • CBP (20)
  • CBP; Marking (1)
  • CEEC (1)
  • Census (11)
  • CFIUS (2)
  • China (8)
  • China; (11)
  • Commerce Department (2)
  • Congress (10)
  • Countervailing Duties (8)
  • CPSC (1)
  • Cuba (18)
  • Customs (12)
  • Customs Brokers (1)
  • DDTC (21)
  • EAA (1)
  • Export Controls (144)
  • Exports (17)
  • FAST (1)
  • FCPA (34)
  • Free Trade Agreements (4)
  • GSP (8)
  • HTS (2)
  • Incoterms (8)
  • India (6)
  • ITAR (46)
  • ITC (2)
  • Japan (2)
  • Libya (5)
  • Miscellaneous (27)
  • NASA (3)
  • North Korea (8)
  • OFAC (36)
  • Sanctions (10)
  • Sanctions; Iran (58)
  • Sanctions; Sanctions; Syria (1)
  • Sanctions; Sudan (6)
  • Sanctions; Syria (6)
  • State Department (4)
  • Trade Policy (1)
  • TSRA (1)
  • Twitter (1)
  • UAE (5)
  • United Kingdom (1)
  • United Nations (3)
  • USTR (3)
  • Vietnam (2)
  • WTO (2)
  • Zimbabwe (1)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (17)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (32)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2011 (63)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ▼  2010 (114)
    • ▼  December (12)
      • Congress Adjourns Without Renewing GSP or Passing ...
      • News and Update on Export Controls Certification R...
      • OFAC Imposes Civil Penalties on Two Financial Inst...
      • U.S. Export Controls Involving India: A Reality Check
      • U.S. Company and Its Chinese Subsidiary Pay $3.75 ...
      • Happy Holidays and Happy New Year From Internation...
      • U.S. Customs Seizes Thousands of Cuban Cigars
      • Today is International Anti-Corruption Day
      • CNBC Running Series Called "Forbidden Zone: Invest...
      • OFAC Issues Statement on Location of SDN List
      • U.S. Export Controls/Sanctions Programs to be Held...
      • Redesign of Treasury's Website Changes Links to SD...
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2009 (237)
    • ►  December (35)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (29)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (29)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ►  2008 (37)
    • ►  December (37)
Powered by Blogger.