CommissionIssues

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

U.S. Company and Its Chinese Subsidiary Pay $3.75 Million in Criminal and Civil Fines for Export Control Violations Involving Pakistan Nuclear Facility

Posted on 6:18 PM by Unknown
The Departments of Justice and Commerce announced today that PPG Paints Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., a wholly-owned Chinese subsidiary of United States-based PPG Industries, Inc., pled guilty to conspiring to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Export Administration Regulations and other related charges.

In addition to the guilty plea, PPG Paints Trading agreed to pay a $2 million criminal fine and forfeit the $32,319 in gross proceeds of the sale.

PPG Industries and PPG Paints Trading entered into a settlement agreement with BIS in which they agreed to pay civil penalties of $750,000 and $1 million respectively and undergo an audit of 2011 and 2012 export transactions.

The guilty plea resulted from actions allegedly taken by PPG Paints Trading to reexport PPG Industries' high-performance coatings from the U.S. to the Chashma 2 Nuclear Power Plant under construction in Pakistan via a third-party distributor in China without obtaining the required BIS export or reexport licenses from BIS.

A BIS export license is required to export the coatings to the Chasma 2 Nuclear Power Plant since the facility is owned by the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, which is included on BIS's Entity List. An export license issued by BIS is required to export or reexport all items "subject to the EAR" to PAEC nuclear facilities. (Note - this illustrates the importance of due diligence in screening end-users against the Entity List and other restricted party lists since this particular facility is not specifically named on the Entity List. Only the parent entity, Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission is named on the Entity List).

In this case, PPG Industries complied with the Entity List requirement by applying to BIS for a license to export their coatings to Chashma 2.  However, the export license was denied by BIS. Following that denial, PPG Paints Trading allegedly agreed to sell the high-performance coatings to a third-party distributor in China which, in turn, would deliver the coatings to the Chashma 2 facility. In its purchase orders for the shipments in question, PPG Paints Trading apparently stated that the coatings were to be used at a nuclear power plant in China that did not require a BIS license.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in BIS, Export Controls | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • DDTC Issues Announcement Regarding Use of USML Category XXI
    The State Department's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) issued an announcement (doc) today that could impact many exporter...
  • Defense Secretary Gates to Outline Export Control Reform Proposals
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates is expected to announce the results of the Obama Administration's proposed export control reform ...
  • OFAC Announces Rare "Finding of Violation" for Failing to File Blocked Property Reports
    OFAC's Office of Enforcement last week issued a rare " Finding of Violation " to Visa International Service Association for fa...
  • Photos From BIS 2010 Export Control Forum
    Below are some photos from the Bureau of Industry and Security's 2010 Export Control Forum that was held earlier this week in Irvine, Ca...
  • U.S.-China High Technology Working Group to Hold Public-Private Sector Dialogue on September 29, 2009
    The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) announced today that the next session of the U.S.-China High Technology Working Group (HTWG), whi...
  • ITAR Freight Forwarder Update: Panalpina Removed from EPLS
    As a follow-up to our February 26, 2012 post on the proposed debarment of a number of freight forwarders and the impact on ITAR-related tr...
  • ITC Initiates Section 421 Market Disruption Investigation on Tires From China
    The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced in today's Federal Register the initiation of a market disruption investigation...
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Issues Answers to FAQs on Iran Reporting Requirements
    The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) yesterday issued some answers to frequently asked questions on the new reporting requireme...
  • DDTC Requesting Comments on New Commodity Jurisdiction Form
    The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) published a Federal Register notice announcing that the 30 day comment period has begun fo...
  • Remarks at Today's State Department Briefing Fail to Clear Up Confusion Over Dealing With BAE Systems
    As has been reported there is a great deal of confusion in the U.S. defense trade community about dealing with BAE Systems plc and their U....

Categories

  • 10+2 (1)
  • 2B350 (1)
  • AES (12)
  • Antidumping (17)
  • ATPA (1)
  • Belarus (2)
  • best practices (1)
  • BIS (56)
  • BIS Update Conference (14)
  • BIS; EAR (22)
  • BIS; EAR; (7)
  • Boycotts (2)
  • Burma/Myanmar (1)
  • C-TPAT (3)
  • Canada (2)
  • CBP (20)
  • CBP; Marking (1)
  • CEEC (1)
  • Census (11)
  • CFIUS (2)
  • China (8)
  • China; (11)
  • Commerce Department (2)
  • Congress (10)
  • Countervailing Duties (8)
  • CPSC (1)
  • Cuba (18)
  • Customs (12)
  • Customs Brokers (1)
  • DDTC (21)
  • EAA (1)
  • Export Controls (144)
  • Exports (17)
  • FAST (1)
  • FCPA (34)
  • Free Trade Agreements (4)
  • GSP (8)
  • HTS (2)
  • Incoterms (8)
  • India (6)
  • ITAR (46)
  • ITC (2)
  • Japan (2)
  • Libya (5)
  • Miscellaneous (27)
  • NASA (3)
  • North Korea (8)
  • OFAC (36)
  • Sanctions (10)
  • Sanctions; Iran (58)
  • Sanctions; Sanctions; Syria (1)
  • Sanctions; Sudan (6)
  • Sanctions; Syria (6)
  • State Department (4)
  • Trade Policy (1)
  • TSRA (1)
  • Twitter (1)
  • UAE (5)
  • United Kingdom (1)
  • United Nations (3)
  • USTR (3)
  • Vietnam (2)
  • WTO (2)
  • Zimbabwe (1)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (17)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (32)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2011 (63)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ▼  2010 (114)
    • ▼  December (12)
      • Congress Adjourns Without Renewing GSP or Passing ...
      • News and Update on Export Controls Certification R...
      • OFAC Imposes Civil Penalties on Two Financial Inst...
      • U.S. Export Controls Involving India: A Reality Check
      • U.S. Company and Its Chinese Subsidiary Pay $3.75 ...
      • Happy Holidays and Happy New Year From Internation...
      • U.S. Customs Seizes Thousands of Cuban Cigars
      • Today is International Anti-Corruption Day
      • CNBC Running Series Called "Forbidden Zone: Invest...
      • OFAC Issues Statement on Location of SDN List
      • U.S. Export Controls/Sanctions Programs to be Held...
      • Redesign of Treasury's Website Changes Links to SD...
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2009 (237)
    • ►  December (35)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (29)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (29)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ►  2008 (37)
    • ►  December (37)
Powered by Blogger.