CommissionIssues

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, May 16, 2011

DDTC Publishes Final Rule Adding ITAR Exemption for Certain Transfers to Dual Nationals and Third-Country Nationals Employed by End-Users

Posted on 2:32 PM by Unknown
Today the State Department's  Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) published a final rule in the Federal Register modifying the policy on providing access to ITAR-controlled defense articles and technical data to dual national and third-country nationals that are employed by authorized end-users that are not otherwise eligible to receive controlled items or information under an existing ITAR exemption.

This final rule, which will not take effect until August 15, 2011, culminates a process that began when the proposed rule was published by DDTC on August 11, 2010 (75 Fed. Reg. 48,625) as part of the Obama Administration's export control reform process. Because of the impact of the proposed rule and the interest and sensitivity of this issue outside of the U.S. DDTC received 32 comments, including comments submitted by foreign governments, the American Bar Association, manufacturers and exporters of defense articles, and other interested trade associations. 

While the public comments submitted were unfortunately not been released to the public, DDTC noted that "the overwhelming majority of commenting parties expressed dissatisfaction with the current rule regarding dual and third-country nationals, citing conflicts with foreign human rights laws as well as the burden of compliance, and welcomed the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls' (DDTC) efforts to reform current practice."

It is important to note that this final rule does not completely address President Obama's goal announced in his speech to the Ex-Im Bank on March 10, 2010 where he pledged to harmonize the EAR and ITAR's conflicting standards on dual and third country nationals, to eliminate the double standard between how the United States treats its own dual nationals and what it demands of other countries; and resolve the inherent conflict between U.S. policy and other countries’ privacy, employment discrimination, and human rights laws.

What today's final rule does do is is to amend Parts 120, 124, and 126 of the ITAR to allow dual national and third-country nationals that are employees by approved end-users once specific procedures have been implemented. Specifically, the final rule adds a new exemption in section 126.18 that allows for intra-company, intra-organization, and intra-government transfers of unclassified defense articles and technical data to dual national and third-country nationals who are bona fide regular employees of the foreign consignee or end-user as long as the transferor has "effective procedures" to prevent diversion to destinations, entities, or for unauthorized purposes. With respect to the scope of effective procedures, section 126.18(c) provides that a security clearance approved by the host nation government for its employees or  a Non-Disclosure Agreement will be sufficient. However, the end-user or consignee must also screen its employees for substantive contacts with restricted or prohibited countries listed in Section 126.1 of the ITAR (which includes China, Venezuela, among others). While the "substantive contacts" screening process was widely criticized, DDTC responded by stating that "It is not DDTC's intent to deny access based solely upon relationships or contacts with family members in a context posing no risk of diversion." However, DDTC also stated that "contacts with government officials and agents of governments of Sec. 126.1(a) countries, be they family or not, would require higher scrutiny."

In response to overwhelming criticism, DDTC left in place the "special retransfer authorizations" in section 124.16 of the ITAR when a Technical Assistance Agreement or Manufacturing License Agreement is in place and the foreign nationals are citizens of NATO and certain other countries. However, DDTC amended section 124.16 section to include workers who have long term employment relationships with licensed end-users, in accordance with the new definition of "regular employee'" added in part 120.

To give readers of International Trade Law News an idea of the international reaction to today's final rule, below is an analysis of DDTC's final rule by two experienced export controls practitioners in the Toronto office of McCarthy Tétrault, a leading Canadian law firm.
Read More
Posted in DDTC, Export Controls, ITAR | No comments

Guest Post: Final US ITAR Rule on Dual and Third Country Nationals Raises New Challenges for Canadian Business

Posted on 2:13 PM by Unknown
Guest Post: Final US ITAR Rule on Dual and Third Country Nationals Raises New Challenges for Canadian Business

by: John W. Boscariol, Brenda C. Swick

Today, the U.S. State Department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) published in the Federal Register the final rule containing its long-awaited amendments to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) governing the access of dual and third-country nationals to ITAR-controlled defence articles, including technical data. These, together with ongoing changes to Canada’s Controlled Goods Program (CGP) generally covering similar goods and technology, are anticipated to have a significant effect on Canadian companies in the aerospace, defence and satellite sectors, and in particular on their security, compliance and screening processes.

Up to now, Canadian firms have faced numerous difficulties with ITAR rules that prohibit employees of certain nationalities or born in certain proscribed countries from accessing US-controlled defence goods and technology in Canada. In order to comply with these restrictions, Canadian companies have had to risk violating provincial and federal anti-discrimination laws, as well as exposure to human rights complaints, when denying employees access to projects involving ITAR-controlled items because of their nationality or country of birth. Companies in affected sectors have had to address, defend and settle costly, and in some cases very public, anti-discrimination claims arising from ITAR compliance.

DDTC officials have stated that the final rule is intended to move away from nationality-based screening and avoid the human rights conflicts that have plagued trade partners in Canada and other countries.

These proposed changes were first released on a preliminary basis for comment by DDTC in August of 2010. Our legal update discussing the preliminary rule can be found here. The final rule retains the essence of what was initially proposed, with some minor changes to the text and some other more significant revisions referred to below.

ITAR Defence Articles May Now be Transferred to 3rd Country or Dual National Employees

Under new ITAR section 126.18, DDTC approval will not be required for the transfer of defence articles, including technical data, to a foreign business entity, foreign government entity, or international organization that is an approved end-user or consignee for those items, "including the transfer to dual nationals or third-country nationals who are bona fide regular employees, directly employed by the foreign consignee or end-user." This exemption will apply provided the transfer takes place completely within the territories where the end-user is located or where the consignee operates, and must be within the scope of an approved export licence, other export authorization, or licence exemption.

Key Condition — Effective Procedures to Prevent Diversion

As a condition of transferring to foreign person employees under this provision, the recipient of the defence article is required to have in place "effective procedures to prevent diversion to destinations, entities, or for purposes other than those authorized by the applicable export licence or other authorization in order to comply with the US Arms Export Control Act and the ITAR."

In order to be considered to have such effective procedures, Canadian firms that are consignees or end-users of the defence articles must either (i) require a security clearance approved by the Canadian government for its employees or (ii) implement a screening process for their employees and execute Non-Disclosure Agreements that provide assurances that employees will not transfer any information to persons or entities unless specifically authorized by the employer.

Under the new rule, Canadian firms will be required to screen all employees who are to access controlled items for "substantive contacts" with the 25 restricted or prohibited countries under the ITAR— including China, Vietnam, Haiti, Venezuela and other countries subject to US military sanctions. The final rule has expanded upon what is meant by substantive contacts — these now include:

regular travel to those countries;
recent or continuing contact with agents, brokers and nationals of those countries;
continued demonstrated allegiance to those countries;
maintenance of business relationships with persons from those countries;
maintenance of a residence in those countries;
receiving salary or other continuing monetary compensation from those countries; or
acts otherwise indicating a risk of diversion.

The amendments provide that, although an employee’s nationality is not in and of itself a determinative factor prohibiting access to defence articles, if an employee is determined to have substantive contacts with persons from the ITAR-restricted or prohibited countries, this is presumed to raise a risk of diversion "unless DDTC determines otherwise".

Companies are also required to maintain a technology security/clearance plan that includes procedures for screening employees’ substantive contacts and maintaining records of the same for five years. The technology security/clearance plan and screening records are to be made available to DDTC or its agents for civil or criminal law enforcement upon request.

Other Significant Aspects of the New Rule

The final rule and DDTC’s accompanying commentary address a number of additional significant issues for Canadian companies:

Perhaps most significant from the Canadian perspective is that, despite requests from parties commenting on the proposed changes, DDTC did not agree to an explicit exemption for companies that comply with other countries’ domestic industrial security programs that provide for effective screening and other security measures for the protection of these controlled items. This means that Canadian companies that are registered and comply with Canada’s Controlled Goods Program (which applies to essentially the same items) must still review and revise existing security measures to ensure compliance with this new ITAR rule for all their employees that will access ITAR-controlled goods or technology.
A number of commenting parties had expressed concern that contract employees would not be subject to the new rule. Although DDTC resisted applying the rule to all contract employees, they agreed to narrowly extend it to workers who have a long-term employment relationships with licensed end-users. This is reflected in a new definition of "regular employee". In addition to an individual permanently and directly employed by the company, "regular employee" now also includes "an individual in a long term contractual relationship with the company where the individual works at the company’s facilities, works under the company’s direction and control, works full time and exclusively for the company, and executes nondisclosure certifications for the company, and where the staffing agency that as seconded the individual has no role in the work the individual performs (other than providing that individual for that work) and the staffing agency would not have access to any controlled technology (other than where specifically authorized by a license)".

Many Canadian companies currently benefit from ITAR section 124.16 special retransfer authorizations. They permit retransfers of defence articles and technical data to employees of foreign (including Canadian) entities who are nationals exclusively of NATO or EU countries or Australia, Japan, New Zealand or Switzerland. DDTC initially proposed to eliminate 124.16 with the implementation of the new rule. In its final rule, however, DDTC reconsidered its position and noted a major concern expressed by commenting parties was that the proposed dual national rule did not include transfer to approved sub-licencees (which are included under section 124.16). Under the new amendments, section 124.16 is now retained and its definition of "regular employee" has been amended to include workers who have long-term employment relationships with end-users as discussed above.
Academic institutions in Canada have encountered particular challenges with compliance issues arising in the context of ITAR-controlled goods and technology. Any uncertainty regarding the application of the new rule to Canadian universities was put to rest by DDTC when it noted in its commentary that it is not prepared to extend the exemption to academic institutions at this time.

Interaction with Canada’s Controlled Goods Programs

Despite DDTC’s refusal to allow an explicit exemption for CGP-registrants at this time, Canada is developing measures to accommodate these new ITAR requirements in an attempt to facilitate compliance for Canadian companies. Following a security threat and risk review, Canada’s Controlled Goods Directorate at Public Works and Government Services (CGD) recently implemented its Enhanced Security Strategy which includes the development of a risk matrix for identifying individuals at risk of unauthorized transfer of controlled goods.

New Questionnaire Developed for Canadian Companies

CGD has indicated that a screening questionnaire is being developed and will be provided to Canadian companies to assist them to identify risks during the security assessment of their employees under the CGP. Factors to be considered in such an assessment are not unlike those in the "substantive contact" analysis under the new ITAR rule and include the following:

contacts with government officials, agents or proxies;
business and/or family contacts;
continuing allegiance to a foreign country;
relationship with a foreign country government (e.g., employment);
frequent travel:
residence and/or bank accounts in a foreign country; and
affiliations within or outside Canada.

CGD has also indicated that the nature and substance of these contacts will be used to determine if an individual should be subject to broader security assessment or denied registration. Where the risk threshold is exceeded, CGD, working with a number of other government departments, will undertake a risk assessment of the individual to determine whether or not access should be granted.

Additional Measures Under the Enhanced Security Strategy

Also included in CGD’s Enhanced Security Strategy are measures to tighten security requirements for Canadian registrants under the CGP in a number of areas, including: students, interns and collectors; broader security assessments of foreign temporary workers and visitors; broader security assessments of transportation companies (together with Transport Canada); additional requirements for a company’s security plan, especially relating to cyber-security risks; more in-depth inspection processes; and the development of a list of debarred individuals and companies.

Next Steps

The new ITAR rule becomes effective August 15, 2011. This, along with Canada’s new CGP requirements, will require Canadian companies to implement enhanced security measures, including screening of all employees requiring access to controlled items. What this exactly entails will have to be determined on a case-by-case basis for each particular employer. It is expected that there will be challenges for Canadian companies undertaking these measures to ensure their procedures satisfy the diligence required by ITAR but at the same time do not expose them to risk of non-compliance with human rights and privacy laws in Canada.

It will be important for Canadian companies in the military, aerospace and satellite sectors that access controlled goods and technology to work closely with their US and Canadian counsel to ensure compliance with the applicable defence control regimes in both countries as well as the requirements for employment, privacy and human rights laws.

McCarthy Tétrault’s International Trade and Investment Law Group has extensive experience in dealing with defence trade control measures and is available to advise on related enforcement, compliance and strategic planning issues.
Read More
Posted in Canada, Export Controls, ITAR | No comments

Thursday, May 5, 2011

International Corporate Compliance Workshop to be Held June 13, 2011 at Center for American and International Law in Texas

Posted on 7:19 AM by Unknown
The well-respected Center for American and International Law is holding an International Corporate Compliance Workshop on June 13, 2011 at their campus in Plano, Texas (near Dallas).

The program will feature a number of timely and important topics, including:
  • U.K. Bribery Act Implementation
  • Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provisions
  • Compliance Implications of “Industry-wide” FCPA Approach to FCPA Enforcement
  • Anti-Corruption Update: Enforcement and Compliance Challenges in India, China, and Brazil
  • Anti-Corruption Auditing Techniques
Presenters and moderators at the conference include in-house counsel and Chief Compliance Officers from Flowserve Corporation, Baker Hughes, Sungard and a number of attorneys in private practice.

Continuing legal education credit is available. 

The Center for American and International Law, which was founded in 1947, is a nonprofit institution dedicated to the continuing education of lawyers and law enforcement officials in the U.S. and abroad.

Click here for more information and to register.
Read More
Posted in FCPA | No comments

Friday, April 29, 2011

Syria Update: US Government Imposes Additional Sanctions Targeted at Syrian Government

Posted on 1:13 PM by Unknown
As a result of the recent human rights abuses and repression in Syria, the U.S. Government today took the following additional steps to put further pressure on the Syrian Government:

Executive Order Blocking Property of Certain Persons with Respect to Human Rights Abuses in Syria

President Obama today signed an Executive Order (EO) expanding the scope of previous EOs on Syria by blocking the property of certain Syrian officials and others responsible for human rights abuses in Syria. The EO covers persons responsible for or involved in human rights abuses and repression; to be a senior official of an entity whose property is blocked pursuant to the EO; to have provided material or financial support to blocked persons; or to be owned or controlled by persons blocked under the EO.

Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

In order to implement the EO, OFAC today added several persons to the Specialty Designated Nationals List (SDN List), including Mahir al-Asad (aka al-Assad), the brother of Syrian President Bashar al-Asad; Atif Najib, President Asad’s cousin and Ali Mamluk, director of Syria’s General Intelligence Directorate (GID). In addition, Syria’s GID was designated under today’s EO. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps was also designated under the Syria EO due to their support of Syria’s GID, although the IRGC has previously been designated by OFAC under other sanctions programs.

Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security

Today the Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) revoked certain licenses for the export and reexport to Syria of items relating to VIP aircraft used to transport senior officials of the Syrian government. BIS took this action under the provision of the Export Administration Regulations that authorizes BIS to revise, suspend or revoke previously issued export or reexport licenses without notice.

Today’s actions will not impact any other licenses issued by BIS authorizing exports to Syria, such as for medical devices.

As a result of the Syria Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003, most exports and reexports of U.S. origin products to Syria have been prohibited since May 2004.
Read More
Posted in OFAC, Sanctions; Syria | No comments

Thursday, March 31, 2011

USTR Issues Annual Reports on Foreign Trade Barriers

Posted on 5:00 AM by Unknown
On March 30, 2011 the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative issued the following annual reports on foreign trade barriers:

National Trade Estimate Report - The 2011 National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers is the 26th in an annual series that surveys significant foreign barriers to U.S. exports in various countries. Among the topics covered in the report are corruption-related issues in various countries and a country-by-country assessment on issues regarding the Arab boycott of Israel.

Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Report- The second annual SPS Report identifies various sanitary and phytosanitary-related trade barriers to U.S. agricultural products.

Technical Barriers to Trade Report - The second annual TBT Report identifies various non-tariff trade barriers, such as product standards, testing requirements, and other technical requirements.

These reports contain a variety of information that is useful to U.S. exporters trying to sell to existing and new markets.
Read More
Posted in USTR | No comments

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

First U.S. Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions of 2011 Filed Today

Posted on 6:19 PM by Unknown
In the first U.S. antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) cases of 2011, U.S. companies today filed AD/CVD petitions on imports of steel wheels from China and refrigerators from South Korea and Mexico. These AD/CVD petitions are the first ones filed in the U.S. since AD/CVD petitions were filed against wood flooring from China in October 2011.

Bottom-Mount Combination Refrigerator-Freezers from South Korea and Mexico

In the first case filed today, Whirlpool Corporation filed AD and CVD petitions against bottom-mount refrigerators from South Korea and an AD petition against the same product from Mexico. According to Whirlpool two Korean manufacturers, Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics, export their products to the U.S. from manufacturing facilities in both Korea and Mexico. The Whirlpool products impacted by these imports are made in Amana, Iowa, where Whirlpool employs approximately 2,000 people.

Steel Wheels from China

In the second case filed today, Accuride Corporation, based in Evansville, Indiana, and Hayes Lemmerz International Inc., based in Northville, Michigan,filed AD and CVD petitions on steel wheels from China. Steel wheels are used on passenger cars, light trucks, sport utility and commercial utility vehicles.

Based on the statutory schedule for these trade remedy cases, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is expected to issue their preliminary injury determinations in mid-May 2011. Assuming an affirmative preliminary injury determination by the ITC, the Department of Commerce’s preliminary decision on the level of subsidies is expected in August 2011 and on dumping in October 2011. The final decisions will be issued by the Department of Commerce and ITC in the second quarter of 2012.
Read More
Posted in Antidumping, Countervailing Duties | No comments

Welcome Attendees of North Dakota Trade Office's Global Business Connections Conference

Posted on 8:54 AM by Unknown
Welcome to those attending the North Dakota Trade Office's Global Business Connections 2011 conference in Fargo, North Dakota on March 30 and 31 in Fargo, North Dakota.

Global Business Connections is a two-day event that connects North Dakota businesses with international trade professionals from around the world. The conference includes panel discussions with leading exporters and international business professionals, break-out seminars on export controls and Incoterms 2010, networking events and an industry trade show. The conference also will include the presentation of North Dakota’s most prestigious international business awards by North Dakota Governor Jack Dalrymple to the following award winners:

2010 North Dakota Exporter of the Year - Healthy Oilseeds, a leading grower, processor and exporter of flax.

2010 Service to North Dakota Exporters Award - Bremer Bank

The keynote speakers at the conference include Gregory Page, Chairman and CEO of Cargill, and Michael Hick, Director of Global Business Initiatives and author of Global Deals: Marketing and Managing Across Cultural Frontiers.

Other speakers at the program included Ed Schafer, who served as U.S. Secretary
of Agriculture and Governor of North Dakota.

North Dakota currently has the nation's lowest unemployment rate and is a leading exporting state. In addition to exporting agriculture products, North Dakota is a leading producer and exporter of machinery and has a thriving aerospace sector.
Read More
Posted in Miscellaneous | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • DDTC Issues Announcement Regarding Use of USML Category XXI
    The State Department's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) issued an announcement (doc) today that could impact many exporter...
  • Results of 2008 GSP Annual Review Announced
    U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk today announced the results of the 2008 Annual Review of the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) pro...
  • Representative Berman Introduces Bill to Update U.S. Export Control System
    Today, Representative Howard Berman (D-CA), the Ranking Member on the House Foreign Affairs Committee introduced what is expected to be the ...
  • Defense Secretary Gates to Outline Export Control Reform Proposals
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates is expected to announce the results of the Obama Administration's proposed export control reform ...
  • U.S.-China High Technology Working Group to Hold Public-Private Sector Dialogue on September 29, 2009
    The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) announced today that the next session of the U.S.-China High Technology Working Group (HTWG), whi...
  • OFAC Makes "Large Scale" Changes to SDN List
    The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control today announced that it released an updated version of its list of Specially ...
  • Photos From BIS 2010 Export Control Forum
    Below are some photos from the Bureau of Industry and Security's 2010 Export Control Forum that was held earlier this week in Irvine, Ca...
  • OFAC Announces Rare "Finding of Violation" for Failing to File Blocked Property Reports
    OFAC's Office of Enforcement last week issued a rare " Finding of Violation " to Visa International Service Association for fa...
  • Former Employee of Arizona Nuclear Power Plant Sentenced to 15 Months in Prison in Connection With Exporting Software to Iran
    Mohammad Reza Alavi, a former employee of the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station in Arizona, was sentenced today in federal district cou...
  • BIS Suspends Libya Export and Reexport Licenses
    Yesterday the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)) announced that it has suspended indefinitely all lice...

Categories

  • 10+2 (1)
  • 2B350 (1)
  • AES (12)
  • Antidumping (17)
  • ATPA (1)
  • Belarus (2)
  • best practices (1)
  • BIS (56)
  • BIS Update Conference (14)
  • BIS; EAR (22)
  • BIS; EAR; (7)
  • Boycotts (2)
  • Burma/Myanmar (1)
  • C-TPAT (3)
  • Canada (2)
  • CBP (20)
  • CBP; Marking (1)
  • CEEC (1)
  • Census (11)
  • CFIUS (2)
  • China (8)
  • China; (11)
  • Commerce Department (2)
  • Congress (10)
  • Countervailing Duties (8)
  • CPSC (1)
  • Cuba (18)
  • Customs (12)
  • Customs Brokers (1)
  • DDTC (21)
  • EAA (1)
  • Export Controls (144)
  • Exports (17)
  • FAST (1)
  • FCPA (34)
  • Free Trade Agreements (4)
  • GSP (8)
  • HTS (2)
  • Incoterms (8)
  • India (6)
  • ITAR (46)
  • ITC (2)
  • Japan (2)
  • Libya (5)
  • Miscellaneous (27)
  • NASA (3)
  • North Korea (8)
  • OFAC (36)
  • Sanctions (10)
  • Sanctions; Iran (58)
  • Sanctions; Sanctions; Syria (1)
  • Sanctions; Sudan (6)
  • Sanctions; Syria (6)
  • State Department (4)
  • Trade Policy (1)
  • TSRA (1)
  • Twitter (1)
  • UAE (5)
  • United Kingdom (1)
  • United Nations (3)
  • USTR (3)
  • Vietnam (2)
  • WTO (2)
  • Zimbabwe (1)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (17)
    • ▼  September (1)
      • DDTC Issues Notices on Commodity Jurisdiction Chan...
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (32)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2011 (63)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2010 (114)
    • ►  December (12)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2009 (237)
    • ►  December (35)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (29)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (29)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ►  2008 (37)
    • ►  December (37)
Powered by Blogger.