CommissionIssues

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

State Department Sanctions Belarussian Energy Company For Doing Business With Iran

Posted on 8:45 AM by Unknown
Yesterday, the U.S. Department of State announced that the U.S. will impose sanctions on Belarusneft, a state-owned Belarusian energy company, under the Iran Sanctions Act (ISA) of 1996 as amended by the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act (CISADA) of 2010, for its involvement in the Iranian petroleum sector. According to the State Department, Belarusneft entered into a $500 million contract with the NaftIran Intertrade Company in 2007 for the development of the Jofeir oilfield in Iran.

The sanctions that will be imposed on Belarusneft include:

1. Denial of U.S. Export-Import Bank assistance in approving, guaranteeing, insuring, extending credit, or participating in the extension of credit regarding the export of any goods or services to Belarusneft;

2. Denial of U.S. government licenses or other approvals required to export or reexport goods or services to Belarusneft;

3. Prohibition of loans or credits to Belarusneft by U.S. financial institution totaling more than $10 million in any twelve-month period, unless the loans or credits are provided to relieve human suffering; and

4. Prohibition on the U.S. Government procuring, or entering into any contract for the procurement of, any goods or services from Belarusneft.

Because Belarusneft is a subsidiary of Belneftekhim and was already to subject to OFAC sanctions, the sanctions imposed under the ISA and CISADA are not likely to impact most U.S. companies. However, as a State Department spokesman indicated, this announcement "sends a message to our partners in Europe as well that this is a company that we've decided to sanction. And I'm sure they have access or would seek access into European markets." 

Because several members of Congress have expressed concern over the Obama Administration's implementation of CISADA, the State Department is likely to announce further Iran-related sanctions in the coming months.

For example, in response to the State Department's announcement Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), Chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said that that "the conspicuous absence of any sanctions on Russian and Chinese companies, despite their longstanding involvement in Iran, is deeply troubling." She also noted that in addition "to going after the low-hanging fruit like Belarusneft, the State Department must impose sanctions against energy giants that continue to do business with Iran.”
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Sanctions; Iran, State Department | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • DDTC Issues Announcement Regarding Use of USML Category XXI
    The State Department's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) issued an announcement (doc) today that could impact many exporter...
  • Defense Secretary Gates to Outline Export Control Reform Proposals
    Defense Secretary Robert Gates is expected to announce the results of the Obama Administration's proposed export control reform ...
  • OFAC Announces Rare "Finding of Violation" for Failing to File Blocked Property Reports
    OFAC's Office of Enforcement last week issued a rare " Finding of Violation " to Visa International Service Association for fa...
  • Photos From BIS 2010 Export Control Forum
    Below are some photos from the Bureau of Industry and Security's 2010 Export Control Forum that was held earlier this week in Irvine, Ca...
  • U.S.-China High Technology Working Group to Hold Public-Private Sector Dialogue on September 29, 2009
    The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) announced today that the next session of the U.S.-China High Technology Working Group (HTWG), whi...
  • ITAR Freight Forwarder Update: Panalpina Removed from EPLS
    As a follow-up to our February 26, 2012 post on the proposed debarment of a number of freight forwarders and the impact on ITAR-related tr...
  • ITC Initiates Section 421 Market Disruption Investigation on Tires From China
    The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced in today's Federal Register the initiation of a market disruption investigation...
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Issues Answers to FAQs on Iran Reporting Requirements
    The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) yesterday issued some answers to frequently asked questions on the new reporting requireme...
  • DDTC Requesting Comments on New Commodity Jurisdiction Form
    The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) published a Federal Register notice announcing that the 30 day comment period has begun fo...
  • Remarks at Today's State Department Briefing Fail to Clear Up Confusion Over Dealing With BAE Systems
    As has been reported there is a great deal of confusion in the U.S. defense trade community about dealing with BAE Systems plc and their U....

Categories

  • 10+2 (1)
  • 2B350 (1)
  • AES (12)
  • Antidumping (17)
  • ATPA (1)
  • Belarus (2)
  • best practices (1)
  • BIS (56)
  • BIS Update Conference (14)
  • BIS; EAR (22)
  • BIS; EAR; (7)
  • Boycotts (2)
  • Burma/Myanmar (1)
  • C-TPAT (3)
  • Canada (2)
  • CBP (20)
  • CBP; Marking (1)
  • CEEC (1)
  • Census (11)
  • CFIUS (2)
  • China (8)
  • China; (11)
  • Commerce Department (2)
  • Congress (10)
  • Countervailing Duties (8)
  • CPSC (1)
  • Cuba (18)
  • Customs (12)
  • Customs Brokers (1)
  • DDTC (21)
  • EAA (1)
  • Export Controls (144)
  • Exports (17)
  • FAST (1)
  • FCPA (34)
  • Free Trade Agreements (4)
  • GSP (8)
  • HTS (2)
  • Incoterms (8)
  • India (6)
  • ITAR (46)
  • ITC (2)
  • Japan (2)
  • Libya (5)
  • Miscellaneous (27)
  • NASA (3)
  • North Korea (8)
  • OFAC (36)
  • Sanctions (10)
  • Sanctions; Iran (58)
  • Sanctions; Sanctions; Syria (1)
  • Sanctions; Sudan (6)
  • Sanctions; Syria (6)
  • State Department (4)
  • Trade Policy (1)
  • TSRA (1)
  • Twitter (1)
  • UAE (5)
  • United Kingdom (1)
  • United Nations (3)
  • USTR (3)
  • Vietnam (2)
  • WTO (2)
  • Zimbabwe (1)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (17)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (32)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ▼  2011 (63)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ▼  March (6)
      • USTR Issues Annual Reports on Foreign Trade Barriers
      • First U.S. Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Pet...
      • Welcome Attendees of North Dakota Trade Office's G...
      • State Department Sanctions Belarussian Energy Comp...
      • Addressing Today’s Most Common Corporate Complianc...
      • BIS Suspends Libya Export and Reexport Licenses
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2010 (114)
    • ►  December (12)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2009 (237)
    • ►  December (35)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (29)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (29)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ►  2008 (37)
    • ►  December (37)
Powered by Blogger.