CommissionIssues

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, August 23, 2010

State Department Imposes $42 Million in Civil Penalties on Xe Services for Numerous ITAR Violations

Posted on 3:08 PM by Unknown
The U.S. Department of State announced today that on August 18, 2010, Xe Services LLC (formerly Blackwater Worldwide) entered into a civil penalty agreement with the State Department's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) to settle numerous alleged violations of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).
The 41 page Proposed Charging Letter issued by DDTC indicates that Xe allegedly committed 288 violations of the ITAR involving the unauthorized export of defense articles and provision of defense services to foreign end-users in multiple countries between 2003 and 2009.

While the charging letter noted that Xe had taken efforts to implement compliance measures and to cooperate with DDTC during the "latter part of the investigation", the Proposed Charging Letter stated:
At the same time, the Department considered aggravating factors in determining what charges to pursue, including that Respondent's historic inability to comply with ITAR controls were system failings; the frequency and nature of Respondent's violations; that Respondent did not fully cooperate with the Department during the initial 18 months of this multi-year investigation; Respondent failed to comply with record-keeping requirements, further impeding the investigation; many of the violations by Respondent were disclosed only after the Department issued a directed disclosure; several of the Respondent's statements were false and some disclosures contained misrepresentations or omissions of material fact that had to be revised as prior reports were determined to be inaccurate or incomplete; and implications for national security.
The State Department noted that many of the alleged ITAR violations occurred while Xe was providing services in support of U.S. Government programs and military operations abroad between 2003 and 2009 and they did not involve sensitive technologies or cause a known harm to national security.
Under the four-year term Consent Agreement, Xe will pay in fines and in remedial compliance measures an aggregate civil penalty of $42 million to complete settlement of civil violations. $12 million of this amount will be suspended for pre-and post-Consent Agreement remedial compliance measures.

In announcing the settlement agreement, the State Department stated that it will not impose an administrative debarment of Xe in this case. The State Department is also rescinding the general policy of denial on export license applications with respect to Xe because the Department is satisfied that the company has taken the necessary steps to address the causes of its ITAR violations, identify compliance problems, and resolve these violations.

The remedial measures included:

  • Replacement of senior management; 
  • Established an independent Export Compliance Committee to oversee its remedial compliance efforts;
  • Improved ITAR compliance procedures; 
  • Conducted various ITAR training; and 
  • Conducted a targeted ITAR audit to confirm the effectiveness of its compliance measures. 
DDTC stated that:
. . . had the Department not taken into consideration Respondent's Voluntary Disclosures, remedial compliance measures, cooperation in the latter part of the investigation, change in management, support of U.S. Government programs, and the absence of disclosure of sensitive technologies or actual harm to national security as significant mitigating factors, the proposed charges against and penalties imposed upon Respondent would likely have been more significant. 


The Consent Agreement also provides that Xe will take a number of additional compliance steps, including external compliance oversight and to continue and improve compliance measures.

The Proposed Charging Letter, Consent Agreement and Order can be found here.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in DDTC, ITAR | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • OFAC Announces Rare "Finding of Violation" for Failing to File Blocked Property Reports
    OFAC's Office of Enforcement last week issued a rare " Finding of Violation " to Visa International Service Association for fa...
  • DDTC Issues Announcement Regarding Use of USML Category XXI
    The State Department's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) issued an announcement (doc) today that could impact many exporter...
  • BIS Publishes Final Rule Regarding In-Country Transfers to Parties on Entity List
    The Bureau of Industry (BIS) published a final rule (PDF) in today's Federal Register amending several sections of Part 744 of the Exp...
  • Photos From BIS 2010 Export Control Forum
    Below are some photos from the Bureau of Industry and Security's 2010 Export Control Forum that was held earlier this week in Irvine, Ca...
  • Highlights from Bureau of Industry and Security's 2012 Annual Report
    The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) recently published its annual report to Congress for Fiscal Year 2012. In addition to providing a...
  • BIS Imposes Denial Orders and Civil Penalties in Cases Involving Unlicensed Exports From U.S. to Taiwan
    In a series of four related cases involving the unlicensed exports of chemicals, metals and electronic components from the U.S. to Taiwan, t...
  • AEI to Present Export Control Reform Program on October 5th in Washington, DC
    While there have been a large number of export control events scheduled lately, here is another good one to add to your calendar. The Americ...
  • BIS Publishes Rule Making Editorial Changes to Commerce Control List
    The Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a final rule in today's Federal Register modifying the Co...
  • Addressing Today’s Most Common Corporate Compliance Gaps
    Guest Post Addressing Today’s Most Common Corporate Compliance Gaps By Steve Kuzma and Paul Harris, Ernst & Young LLP* Increased corpora...
  • Seasons Greetings and Happy New Year From International Trade Law News and Letter to Santa Regarding Possible Compliance Violations
    Season's Greetings and Happy New Year to all of our loyal readers and clients around the world. See you in 201 3 .  In the spirit of th...

Categories

  • 10+2 (1)
  • 2B350 (1)
  • AES (12)
  • Antidumping (17)
  • ATPA (1)
  • Belarus (2)
  • best practices (1)
  • BIS (56)
  • BIS Update Conference (14)
  • BIS; EAR (22)
  • BIS; EAR; (7)
  • Boycotts (2)
  • Burma/Myanmar (1)
  • C-TPAT (3)
  • Canada (2)
  • CBP (20)
  • CBP; Marking (1)
  • CEEC (1)
  • Census (11)
  • CFIUS (2)
  • China (8)
  • China; (11)
  • Commerce Department (2)
  • Congress (10)
  • Countervailing Duties (8)
  • CPSC (1)
  • Cuba (18)
  • Customs (12)
  • Customs Brokers (1)
  • DDTC (21)
  • EAA (1)
  • Export Controls (144)
  • Exports (17)
  • FAST (1)
  • FCPA (34)
  • Free Trade Agreements (4)
  • GSP (8)
  • HTS (2)
  • Incoterms (8)
  • India (6)
  • ITAR (46)
  • ITC (2)
  • Japan (2)
  • Libya (5)
  • Miscellaneous (27)
  • NASA (3)
  • North Korea (8)
  • OFAC (36)
  • Sanctions (10)
  • Sanctions; Iran (58)
  • Sanctions; Sanctions; Syria (1)
  • Sanctions; Sudan (6)
  • Sanctions; Syria (6)
  • State Department (4)
  • Trade Policy (1)
  • TSRA (1)
  • Twitter (1)
  • UAE (5)
  • United Kingdom (1)
  • United Nations (3)
  • USTR (3)
  • Vietnam (2)
  • WTO (2)
  • Zimbabwe (1)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (17)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (32)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2011 (63)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ▼  2010 (114)
    • ►  December (12)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ▼  August (16)
      • Commerce Department's Proposed Changes to AD/CVD P...
      • U.S. Representatives Send Letter Asking President ...
      • Date of First Meeting and Structure of President's...
      • State Department Imposes $42 Million in Civil Pena...
      • September NCITD Meeting to Focus on Export Control...
      • Trade Compliance Certificates vs. Certification: B...
      • Census Bureau Reports That AESDirect Export Filing...
      • OFAC Issues Guidance on Implementation of Restrict...
      • State Department's Proposed Policy Change on Forei...
      • AESDirect Outage Notice and AES Downtime Policy
      • Overview and Summary of DDTC Consent Agreement wit...
      • House Members Form Bipartisan Working Group on Ira...
      • DDTC Publishes Final Rule Requiring CJs to be Subm...
      • Treasury Identifies and Designates 21 Entities Det...
      • Today's News and Notes
      • Interim Final Rule Intended to Clarify Purpose of ...
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2009 (237)
    • ►  December (35)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (29)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (29)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ►  2008 (37)
    • ►  December (37)
Powered by Blogger.