CommissionIssues

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Despite Reports U.S. Export Control Policy on Syria Remains Unchanged

Posted on 6:17 AM by Unknown
The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) recently posted an updated version of it guidance and frequently asked questions involving U.S. exports to Syria. The bottom line: Despite many news reports to the contrary, U.S. export controls involving Syria remains unchanged.

As we previously reported several weeks ago, various news reports, including an article in the New York Times, indicated that the U.S. Government was easing or lifting sanctions on Syria. While the Obama Administration has indicated that it will "process all eligible applications for export licenses to Syria as quickly as possible," the current export licensing requirements to Syria remain unchanged.

Here is the summary of the current restrictions on Syria that was recently posted by BIS:
BIS requires a license for the export or reexport to Syria of all items subject to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), except food and medicines not on the Commerce Control List (CCL). Pursuant to the waiver authority exercised by the President in Executive Order 13338, BIS may consider several categories of items on a case-by-case basis including medicines on the CCL and medical devices; parts and components intended to ensure the safety of civil aviation and the safe operation of commercial passenger aircraft; and telecommunications equipment and associated computers, technology, and software. License applications for other exports and reexports to Syria are subject to a general policy of denial.
In our experience, BIS and the other U.S. government reviewing agencies involved in the export licensing process have consistently approved licenses to export controlled medicines and medical devices to Syria on a regular basis and in a fairly timely manner (much faster than OFAC's processing of TSRA licenses for Iran and Sudan). The only question is whether the U.S. will begin issuing licenses for the export of aircraft components, telecommunication products and other types of eligible products faster than it has in the past.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Export Controls, Sanctions; Syria | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • OFAC Announces Rare "Finding of Violation" for Failing to File Blocked Property Reports
    OFAC's Office of Enforcement last week issued a rare " Finding of Violation " to Visa International Service Association for fa...
  • DDTC Issues Announcement Regarding Use of USML Category XXI
    The State Department's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) issued an announcement (doc) today that could impact many exporter...
  • Photos From BIS 2010 Export Control Forum
    Below are some photos from the Bureau of Industry and Security's 2010 Export Control Forum that was held earlier this week in Irvine, Ca...
  • BIS Imposes Denial Orders and Civil Penalties in Cases Involving Unlicensed Exports From U.S. to Taiwan
    In a series of four related cases involving the unlicensed exports of chemicals, metals and electronic components from the U.S. to Taiwan, t...
  • BIS Publishes Final Rule Regarding In-Country Transfers to Parties on Entity List
    The Bureau of Industry (BIS) published a final rule (PDF) in today's Federal Register amending several sections of Part 744 of the Exp...
  • BIS Publishes Rule Making Editorial Changes to Commerce Control List
    The Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a final rule in today's Federal Register modifying the Co...
  • Addressing Today’s Most Common Corporate Compliance Gaps
    Guest Post Addressing Today’s Most Common Corporate Compliance Gaps By Steve Kuzma and Paul Harris, Ernst & Young LLP* Increased corpora...
  • Seasons Greetings and Happy New Year From International Trade Law News and Letter to Santa Regarding Possible Compliance Violations
    Season's Greetings and Happy New Year to all of our loyal readers and clients around the world. See you in 201 3 .  In the spirit of th...
  • DDTC Requesting Comments on New Commodity Jurisdiction Form
    The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) published a Federal Register notice announcing that the 30 day comment period has begun fo...
  • Finding a Willing Buyer Is Only the First Step of the Export Process
    U.S. Exporters Looking to Boost Business Overseas Need to Understand the Rules and Regulations That Apply to International Trade Transaction...

Categories

  • 10+2 (1)
  • 2B350 (1)
  • AES (12)
  • Antidumping (17)
  • ATPA (1)
  • Belarus (2)
  • best practices (1)
  • BIS (56)
  • BIS Update Conference (14)
  • BIS; EAR (22)
  • BIS; EAR; (7)
  • Boycotts (2)
  • Burma/Myanmar (1)
  • C-TPAT (3)
  • Canada (2)
  • CBP (20)
  • CBP; Marking (1)
  • CEEC (1)
  • Census (11)
  • CFIUS (2)
  • China (8)
  • China; (11)
  • Commerce Department (2)
  • Congress (10)
  • Countervailing Duties (8)
  • CPSC (1)
  • Cuba (18)
  • Customs (12)
  • Customs Brokers (1)
  • DDTC (21)
  • EAA (1)
  • Export Controls (144)
  • Exports (17)
  • FAST (1)
  • FCPA (34)
  • Free Trade Agreements (4)
  • GSP (8)
  • HTS (2)
  • Incoterms (8)
  • India (6)
  • ITAR (46)
  • ITC (2)
  • Japan (2)
  • Libya (5)
  • Miscellaneous (27)
  • NASA (3)
  • North Korea (8)
  • OFAC (36)
  • Sanctions (10)
  • Sanctions; Iran (58)
  • Sanctions; Sanctions; Syria (1)
  • Sanctions; Sudan (6)
  • Sanctions; Syria (6)
  • State Department (4)
  • Trade Policy (1)
  • TSRA (1)
  • Twitter (1)
  • UAE (5)
  • United Kingdom (1)
  • United Nations (3)
  • USTR (3)
  • Vietnam (2)
  • WTO (2)
  • Zimbabwe (1)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (17)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (32)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2011 (63)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2010 (114)
    • ►  December (12)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ▼  2009 (237)
    • ►  December (35)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (29)
    • ▼  August (10)
      • DDTC Publishes Statutory Debarment List
      • BIS Imposes $70,000 Civil Penalty on NY Freight Fo...
      • OFAC Imposes $5.75 Million Penalty on Bank for Vio...
      • Cracking Down on Iran's Illicit Trade
      • Despite Reports U.S. Export Control Policy on Syri...
      • Latest Posts on Recent BIS Export Enforcement Case...
      • BIS Imposes Civil Penalties on U.S. Exporter and E...
      • BIS Imposes $610,000 Penalty on Houston Company fo...
      • President Obama Orders Export Control Review Initi...
      • Professor Roth Released on Bond Pending Appeal; Ro...
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (29)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ►  2008 (37)
    • ►  December (37)
Powered by Blogger.